BIOLOGICAL RESULTS
System of life criteria
In biology, a big confusion exists until now
about the question, what and when can be considered something
living, non-living or dead. Gánti, by setting up a phenomenological
system of life criteria has not only clarified the borderline,
but has also shown that some of the old criteria are not criteria
of individual life, but those of a potential to develop the living
world (absolute and potential life criteria).
The minimum model of life: the chemoton
Having life criteria at hand, it can be investigated
to what an extent the more and more complex systems designed by
means of fluid automata satisfy the individual life criteria.
The simplest such system satisfying all the absolute life criteria
is the self-reproducing, program-controlled fluid automaton, the
chemoton. Consequently, the chemoton should be considered a living
system, even the simplest living system, i.e. the minimum
system of life . Chemotons can be designed by exact engineering
methods and discussed quantitatively by cycle stoichiometry.
The basic units of the living world
Chemotons satisfy not only the absolute
life criteria, but also the potential ones, consequently they
are not only living systems, but they are also capable of evolving
into the living world. On the other hand, all known members of
the living world in the Earth built on a basic chemoton organization.
It is noteworthy that chemoton theory has facilitated a fresh
look at the 'levels-of-selection' debate leading to a view going
beyond replicators (genes) and encompassing an irreducible developmental
dimension (See also: James Griesemer: The philosophical significance
of Gánti's work. In: T. Gánti: The Principles of Life p. 169-186)
By this, the chemoton theory creates the stoichiometrical foundations
of an exact, theoretical biology.
Page 10 |